February 27, 2024

Supply: Way of life Asia Hong Kong

By: Akshat Mittal

In a big improvement, the Supreme Court docket of India has granted bail to former Mumbai

Police officer Pradeep Sharma, who was arrested in reference to the Antilia bomb planting

case and the next killing of businessman Mansukh Hiran. The choice got here on

Wednesday, following a bench comprising Justice AS Bopanna and Justice PS Narasimha’s

deliberations. Pradeep Sharma’s bail was challenged after a Bombay Excessive Court docket order denied

him bail within the case.

The Antilia bomb planting case revolves across the discovery of a bomb-laden SUV close to the

residence of industrialist Mukesh Ambani in south Mumbai on February 25, 2021. The SUV was

discovered within the possession of businessman Mansukh Hiran, who tragically misplaced his life on March 5,

2021, below suspicious circumstances. The case garnered nationwide consideration resulting from its

high-profile nature, with the highlight on the potential motives behind the planting of the

explosive-laden automobile.

Sachin Waze, a former Mumbai Police officer who was subsequently dismissed from the pressure,

is the prime accused in each the Antilia bomb planting case and the killing of Mansukh Hiran.

The case took a fancy flip with allegations that Pradeep Sharma, one other former colleagueof Waze, had performed a task in helping Waze in eliminating Hiran. These allegations shaped the

foundation for the denial of bail to Sharma by the Bombay Excessive Court docket.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi represented Pradeep Sharma in his bail plea earlier than the

Supreme Court docket. He argued that there was no direct proof linking Sharma to the primary

accused, Sachin Waze, and emphasised that the bomb-laden SUV had been parked close to

Antilia by Waze, at the side of Hiran. In accordance with Rohatgi, this act was orchestrated to

deliver Waze into the limelight and create an impression that he had thwarted an assault. Sharma

distanced himself from these actions, asserting that he was unconcerned with Waze’s


However, Extra Solicitor Common SV Raju represented the Nationwide Investigation

Company (NIA) and opposed Pradeep Sharma’s bail plea. Raju argued that Sharma was a

co-conspirator within the killing of Mansukh Hiran and had met Waze, however the particulars of their

discussions have been unclear. The query of what transpired between the 2 throughout their assembly

was a central level of competition.

After fastidiously listening to arguments from either side, the bench reserved its order on Monday,

resulting in the awaited verdict on Wednesday. The Supreme Court docket’s resolution to grant bail to

Pradeep Sharma raises questions concerning the energy of the proof towards him and his

alleged involvement within the occasions surrounding the Antilia bomb planting case and Mansukh

Hiran’s demise.

The case has unfolded towards the backdrop of the intrigue surrounding the safety lapse close to

Mukesh Ambani’s residence and the next demise of Mansukh Hiran. The Antilia bomb

planting incident raised considerations concerning the security and safety of high-profile people, whereas

Hiran’s mysterious demise intensified hypothesis about potential motives and cover-ups.

The Supreme Court docket’s bail resolution marks a pivotal second on this advanced case, prompting

discussions concerning the nature of proof, the function of varied people, and the bigger

implications for legislation enforcement and justice. The authorized proceedings will proceed as extra particulars

emerge and the case unfolds additional, shedding gentle on the circumstances and motivations

behind these high-profile occasions that captured the nation’s consideration.